“Geo-societal Narratives - contextualising Geosciences.”
What made
this book possible?
All co-authors
cooperated, although they never met face-to-face, and most did never meet in the
past. The co-authors' scientific networks were segregated from each other
before the publication project. More than half of their connections went
through the editors' weak links on (scientific) social media platforms. A
simple analysis of past cooperation indicates less than two bilateral links
between authors. The number drops below one when the editors are excluded from
the analysis.
Hence, the
willingness of all co-authors to cooperate with unknown peers as well as the
trust of the publisher’s editors in this untested partnership was paramount for
the making of the book.
What is the didactic idea
of this book?
So far, geoscientists have engaged with the implications of 'responsible science' on their own. However, studying the societal
relevance of geosciences requires the interaction of earth-sciences / geosciences
and people-sciences, that is, the
social sciences, political sciences, and humanities. Therefore, this
book gathers scholars from the people-sciences to join geoscientists in
studying geosciences' societal contexts. In that sense, this book offers an antithesis
to simplistic views of societal geo-dynamics.
What is the background
to this book?
Contemporary societies use
geosciences know-how in business, public undertakings, and cultural activities (Bohle, 2021).
In times of anthropogenic global change, geoscience expertise shall enable people to take care
of seven-billion-plus fellow humans. Therefore,
geoscience expertise needs a comprehensive understanding of the social and
political facets of the 'human condition' (Hamilton, 2017), a ‘human
planet’ (Lewis and Maslin, 2018).
So far, and like scientists from other
disciplines, professional geoscientists have engaged with the concept of 'responsible
science' (United Nations, 2013). This book is a cross-disciplinary exchange of narratives of various
philosophical, applied, or political subjects to strengthen interdisciplinary
inquiry.
What is this book about?
This book initiates a
direct exchange between scholars in 'Earth sciences' (geosciences) and 'People sciences' (Castree, 2017) in
the spirit[2]
of the philosopher and
physicists Mario Bunge (1919-2020) and his imperative 'Enjoy life and help
live'. Mario Bunge is inspiring because he taught the rebellious character
of philosophy that it must be linked with the best of up-to-date science, be happy
to give society something in exchange for the education getting, be tolerant
regarding all authentic philosophies and rational debates among them. This book
applies that philosophy is about engineering thinking, hence 'A philosophy
without ontology is invertebrate; it is acephalous without epistemology,
confused without semantics, and limbless without axiology, praxeology, and
ethics. [3]'
What is
the methodology of this book?
The
editors created an environment to extract novel ideas. They gathered a diverse
group of authors who, so far, did not cooperate. Ideas and opinions are
juxtaposed, e.g. how to approach anthropocentrism in the Anthropocene. As
sketched in the first chapter (Bohle and Marone,
2021), the emphasis was on breaking new ground in a common
quest for ‘societal geosciences’.
References:
Bohle, M. (2021). ‘Citizen, Geoscientist and Associated
Terra-former’, in Global Threats in the Anthropocene: From COVID-19 to the
Future, eds. L. Mercantanti and S. Montes (Il Sileno Edizioni), 169–186.
Bohle, M., and Marone,
E. (2021). ‘Why Geo-societal Narratives?’, in Geo-societal Narratives
(Cham: Springer International Publishing), 1–16.
doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79028-8_1.
Castree, N. (2017).
Speaking for the ‘people disciplines’: Global change science and its human
dimensions. Anthr. Rev. 4, 160–182. doi:10.1177/2053019617734249.
Lewis, S. L., and
Maslin, M. A. (2018). The Human Planet - How We Created the Anthropocene.
London: Penguin Random House.
Marone, E., and Bohle,
M. (2020). Geoethics for Nudging Human Practices in Times of Pandemics. Sustainability
12, 7271. doi:10.3390/su12187271.
Mokyr, J. (2016).
Institutions and the Origins of the Great Enrichment. Atl. Econ. J. 44,
243–259. doi:10.1007/s11293-016-9496-4.
United Nations (2013).
World Social Science Report 2013. , ed. UNESCO OECD Publishing
doi:10.1787/9789264203419-en.
[1] https://www.palgrave.com/us/book/9783030790271
[2] https://a-g-i-l.de/mario-bunge-the-big-questions-come-in-bundles-not-one-at-time/ (accessed 23rd February 2021).
[3] Bunge, M.
(2016) Between Two Worlds: Memoirs of a Philosopher-Scientist. Springer
Biographies, Springer, 496 p. (p 406).
No comments:
Post a Comment